Same folder, two very different rights: one person edits freely, another can look but never change or delete a thing. Doing this with groups takes ten minutes and stays correct forever — doing it person by person becomes a mess within a month.
Every office reaches this moment: the billing folder is shared, the senior accountant must edit and delete, the new assistant must only read — and one wrong delete could cost a day of work. The wrong way is ticking boxes for individual people on five different screens. The admin way is two groups: build them once, and every future staff change is a one-line edit.
lusrmgr.mscAccounts-Full and Accounts-ReadThe same thing from Command Prompt (run as administrator):
net localgroup "Accounts-Full" /addnet localgroup "Accounts-Full" Ravi /add
fsmgmt.msc → Shares → your share → Properties → Share PermissionsAccounts-Full with Change, and Accounts-Read with ReadChange (not Full Control) is the right share level for editors — nobody except an admin needs the power to alter permissions themselves.
Accounts-Full → tick Modify (this includes read, write and delete)Accounts-Read → tick Read & Execute and List folder contents onlyicacls "D:\Billing" /grant "Accounts-Read":(OI)(CI)RX and icacls "D:\Billing" /grant "Accounts-Full":(OI)(CI)MRemember the combination rule: network access is the stricter of the two lists, so both must agree with the plan.
Administrators see everything, so your own test proves nothing. Log in as the assistant (or use a test account in the read group), open the share, and try three things: open a file (must work), save a change (must fail), delete a file (must fail). Then test the senior's account for the opposite. Only this test catches a wrong group membership or a stray Deny.
When the assistant is promoted, you do not touch the folder at all — you move the account: net localgroup "Accounts-Read" Sana /delete then net localgroup "Accounts-Full" Sana /add. When someone leaves, remove their account from every group and disable the account. One honest note: a person must sign out and back in on their PC before a group change applies to them — Windows hands out group membership at logon.
The video demonstrates the full flow — creating groups, granting different levels, and testing what each user actually sees.
▶️ Watch Full VideoYes. Read permission includes copying — read-only stops changes to the originals, not copying. No Windows permission can let someone view a file but truly prevent copying it; if data must never leave, it should not be in a readable share.
Modify covers real work: read, write, rename and delete files. Full Control adds changing permissions and taking ownership — powers that belong to administrators, not daily users, however senior they are.
Check in this order: did they sign out and back in after the group change, is the share permission also at Change level (both lists combine), and is there a Deny entry anywhere in the NTFS list for a group they belong to?