Technical Anshu
Tutorials Blog
🗂️ Synology Drive Decisions

Synology Drive vs Plain SMB Shared Folder When Each One Wins

Every Synology owner asks it sooner or later: we already have shared folders — why install Drive at all? Because the two tools solve different problems, and choosing wrong in either direction creates daily pain. Here is the honest split.

✍️ Technical Anshu🗄️ Synology DSM⏱️ 6 minute read
🎥 Watch the complete live setup in the video above

A mapped SMB drive is the classic way to use a NAS: the folder appears as a drive letter, files open directly from the server, and it has worked for thirty years. Synology Drive takes the opposite approach — files live on each PC and sync to the NAS. Neither is the upgrade of the other. They are different tools with different strengths, and the proof is that most well-run offices end up using both, deliberately.

Synology Drive vs a plain SMB mapped drive — the short version
Works offlineDrive yes — SMB no
Old versions of filesDrive yes — SMB no
File locking for appsSMB yes — Drive no
Remote use without VPNDrive yes — SMB no
Live database filesSMB ONLY — NEVER SYNC
Neither tool wins everywhere. The offices that work best use each one where it is strong — often on the same NAS.
1

What Plain SMB Gives You

With a mapped drive, there is one copy of each file, on the NAS, and everyone opens that same copy. That single fact buys real things: file locking (a second person opening the file is told it is in use, instead of silently creating a rival version), zero sync delay, nothing stored on PCs, and perfect behaviour from applications that expect a real file server — including the big ones, like accounting and database-driven software. Setup is five minutes and every program ever written understands it. Its weaknesses are equally structural: no connection means no files at all, there are no built-in old versions, and a deleted file is gone unless the NAS has snapshots or a recycle bin configured.

2

What Synology Drive Adds

Drive's sync model buys the things SMB cannot: files are on the laptop, so work continues on trains, at client sites and during internet outages; every Team Folder carries version history, so yesterday's good copy survives today's bad save; sharing links, phone access and multi-office ShareSync come along in the same package; and remote staff can work without a VPN if you choose. The costs are the mirror image of SMB's strengths: copies everywhere means sync conflicts when two people edit together, initial syncs take time, and there is no file locking for ordinary files — the last save wins.

3

The Red Line — Never Sync a Live Database File

One rule outranks every preference in this comparison: files that a program holds open and writes to constantly — accounting data files, databases, mail stores — must never live in a synced folder. Sync software copies files as they change, and a database copied mid-write is a corrupted database waiting for its moment; worse, two PCs syncing it will take turns overwriting each other. Keep such data on an SMB share (or on the proper server the software vendor recommends) and let only the application's own backup routine move it. Documents sync beautifully. Databases do not.

4

Where Each One Wins, Workload by Workload

  1. Office documents, shared projects, anything edited at multiple desks or from home — Drive
  2. Accounting and database-driven applications — SMB, no debate
  3. Huge media files worked on inside the office — SMB on the LAN; syncing gigabytes per save helps nobody
  4. Laptop staff who travel — Drive, with on-demand sync for the big folders
  5. A simple office where everyone sits together and nothing leaves the building — SMB alone can honestly be enough

Notice the pattern: the question is never about the NAS. It is about how each kind of work actually moves through your week.

5

The Hybrid Most Offices Land On

The mature setup on one NAS usually looks like this: Drive runs the document world — Team Folders for departments and projects, backup tasks for PCs, versions protecting it all — while plain SMB shares quietly serve the application data and the giant media library on the local network. One practical discipline keeps the hybrid clean: a given folder lives in one world or the other, so nobody edits the same file through a mapped drive in the morning and a synced copy in the afternoon. Pick per folder, tell the team the map, and both tools do what they are best at.

🔴 The one-sentence decision: if people need the file away from the server, in versions, or across offices — Drive. If software needs to lock the file and write to it live — SMB. When in doubt, ask which of those two sentences describes the work.

🎥 Watch the Full Video

Watch the Synology Drive setup video to see the Drive half of this hybrid built properly — Team Folders, clients and backup tasks.

▶️ Watch Full Video
❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Can the same folder be used through both Drive and SMB?

A Team Folder is also a normal shared folder, so it is technically reachable both ways — but editing the same files through a mapped drive and through sync invites confusion and conflicts. Give each folder one home and one habit, and keep the team to it.

Is Drive slower than SMB inside the office?

For opening files, usually the opposite — synced files open from the local disk. The slow part is the initial sync and large changes travelling between PC and NAS. SMB opens instantly but depends entirely on the network and the NAS being up at that moment.

We are a tiny office. Do we even need Drive?

Honestly, maybe not yet. If everyone works in one room, on desktops, with application data — SMB plus a recycle bin and NAS snapshots can be a perfectly sound setup. Drive earns its place the day laptops, home working, or a second office arrive — and it installs in minutes when they do.

This guide is based on the Technical Anshu Synology Drive collaboration and PC backup video • Stuck on a step? Ask in the video comments — you will get a reply 🙏